Operational Track Record: Topstep has been operating since 2012 with 14 years of market presence, while Phidias was founded in 2023 and has only 3 years of operation. This significant difference in tenure suggests Topstep has weathered multiple market cycles and regulatory environments. Topstep offers a single platform (ProjectX) whereas Phidias provides seven platform options including popular choices like NinjaTrader and TradingView, plus two data feed providers.
Funding and Costs: Topstep's lowest account price is $49 compared to Phidias at $55. However, Phidias currently offers an 80% discount with code PHIDIAS80, making accounts substantially cheaper upfront. Phidias allows up to 15 funded accounts versus Topstep's 5, providing more flexibility for traders seeking multiple concurrent positions. Both firms offer daily payout timing and similar 2-5 day payout frequency.
Trader Experience Concerns: The data reveals contrasting risk profiles. Topstep's AI rating of 5.6/10 reflects mixed experiences, with noted strengths in support responsiveness and reliable payouts offset by concerns about rules enforcement consistency and unexplained account restrictions. Phidias carries a substantially lower AI rating of 1.7/10, with multiple reports documenting payout delays, account access issues, support unresponsiveness, and disputed rule enforcement. While both firms show rules enforcement concerns, Phidias reports broader systemic issues across payout processing, technical stability, and support quality. Traders considering either firm should carefully review current terms and seek recent trader feedback before committing capital.
| 20 | Reviews Analyzed | 20 |
| Phidias | Metric | Topstep |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Max Funded Accounts | 5 |
| Futures | Assets | Futures |
| 2-5 Days | Payout Frequency | 2-5 Days |
| Daily | Payout Timing | Daily |